Paul, No, I wouldn’t agree that a near miss is a hit. And I don’t have a problem with ‘near miss.’ ‘Near’ is just an adjective describing how close the miss was (just as ‘near future’ informs us that an event is not far off, and certainly not in the ‘far future). If one misses a target (date, goal, etc.) it seems like it is informative to distinguish between a miss that was close and one that was off by a mile, and that’s maybe why the expression is so widely used and generally accepted. Of course, one could also describe a ‘near miss’ as a ‘near collision’ or in other contexts a ‘near success.’ But since when do we want to restrict our way of saying things to one, when we can say it in two (or three, or . . . .)? (<:)
_______________________________
NEAR MISS noun: 1) A narrowly avoided collision involving two or more aircraft, ships, boats, or motor vehicles. 2) A shot that is extremely close to but not directly on target – just misses a target. 3) Something that fails by a very narrow margin: “Her campaign for the Senate was a near miss.”
(
American Heritage Dictionary, Random House Unabridged Dictionary)
_______________________
Ken G – December 30, 2004
Reply from ( - )