Hans, Not to belabor the point, but I guess it’s too late for that (<:), they are exactly synonyms in expressions like wax/waxing poetic (nostalgic, philosophical, nostalgic, indignant, . . .): in these expressions “wax/waxing = become/becoming” and I never implied that they were synonyms in general – that one could be replaced by the other. In your above posting you said that “Your elaborate [not quite sure why replacing a sentence by one word is considered ‘elaborate’!] way of putting it, however, comprises but doesn't explicitly mention the fact that 'become' often cannot just be replaced with 'wax.'” Well, you’re right, I don’t explicitly mention it. But since the particular usage was being narrowly defined, why would one need to? Enough (probably more than enough) said on this point! (<:)
________________
Ken – July 11, 2004
Reply from Ken Greenwald (Fort Collins, CO - U.S.A.)