was not to

This is the place to post questions and discussions on usage and style. The members of the Wordwizard Clubhouse will also often be able to help you to formulate that difficult letter.
Post Reply

was not to

Post by azz » Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:41 am

a. Why he went to the restaurant was not to talk to John.

Is that sentence ambiguous?

I see two possible meanings.

1. He went to the restaurant, but it wasn't because he wanted to talk to John.

2. Why he went to the restaurant was to not talk to John. Why he went to the restaurant was in order not to talk to John.

Would you say that is correct?

Many thanks.
ACCESS_POST_ACTIONS

Re: was not to

Post by Bobinwales » Wed Feb 24, 2021 8:22 pm

a. Why he went to the restaurant was not to talk to John.

I'm afraid that that sentence isn't so much ambiguous, as nonsense.

I would have said something along the lines of, "He did go to the restaurant, but it wasn't to talk to John.
ACCESS_POST_ACTIONS
Signature: All those years gone to waist!
Bob in Wales

Re: was not to

Post by Erik_Kowal » Wed Feb 24, 2021 11:04 pm

I agree with Bob.

For sense 2), you could make the sentence sound less weird if you included the word "avoid":

He went to the restaurant to avoid talking to John.

You could make sense 1) work by inverting the clauses adding a contrasting assertion, e.g.:

It wasn't to avoid talking to John that he went to the restaurant, but to collect his cash.
ACCESS_POST_ACTIONS

ACCESS_END_OF_TOPIC
Post Reply