Page 1 of 1

Pro's and Con's

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:52 pm
by John Barton
Journalism seems to abhor 'small majorities' and 'large minorities'. And tries to convince us that motives must always be "ulterior". I imagine myself trying to convince a court that 'my motives were purely citerior' - an almost obsolete but very useful opposite found in the OED. As also cis- (montane etc) versus ultramontane. With 'trans-(Himalayan, etc) strictly meaning across rather than beyond.

In contrast, they love citing the 'pro's and con's' of every debate.
Perhaps 'conversely' needs an opposite 'proversely'. But of course the suffixes pro- and con- are very unreliable in practice. Thus congress is not always the opposite of progress. Nor constitution of prostitution. Take:
confuse/profuse, confusion/profusion
convoke/provoke, convocation/provocation
and many more.

And why does the victim always have to be lying 'prone' on the floor, even when face up (i.e. supine)?

Re: Pro's and Con's

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 2:00 am
by Ken Greenwald
John, I have a friend who's a pro artist.

Ken – September 11, 2013

Re: Pro's and Con's

Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 1:50 pm
by Phil White
Hi John,

Long time no see!

Lovely spot, although it is, as I'm sure you are aware, based on a false prefix.

The opposite of "pro" in pro's and con's is "contra", of which "con" is a contraction (conction???) in that phrase only.

Still a nice thing to play with, though.

Re: Pro's and Con's

Posted: Fri Sep 20, 2013 8:41 pm
by Ken Greenwald
I once heard of an ex-con who became a pro.

Ken – September 20, 2013