Pin-point errors, please!

This formerly read-only archive of threads dates back to 1996, but as of March 2007 is open to new postings. For technical reasons, the early dates shown do not accurately reflect the actual date of posting.

Feel free to add new postings to any of the existing threads in the archived forums, but please create any new language-related threads in one of the Language Discussion Forums.
Post Reply

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Topic » Sat Dec 29, 2001 5:20 am

It'd be a great favour if I was told where I went wrong wording this post.

http://discuss.fogcreek.com/joelonsoftw ... xReplies=2
Submitted by Sathyaish Chakravarthy (New Delhi - India)
Post actions:
Signature: Topic imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 5:34 am

Nothing much wrong with the post, Sathyaish. Some spacing problems, a couple or so prepositions are not quite kosher, a couple of punctuation marks misplaced and overall a good job. Your enthusiasm for the book comes through quite well.
Reply from Leif Thorvaldson (Eatonville - U.S.A.)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 5:49 am

Thanks, Lief. It'd be nice to have some nitpicking done.
Reply from Sathyaish Chakravarthy (New Delhi - India)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 6:03 am

I see I have spelt your name wrongly the last time, Leif.
Reply from Sathyaish Chakravarthy (New Delhi - India)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 6:17 am

As a budding proofreader, I'm happy to nitpick:

1. for "an year" substitute "a year"
2. It's called (not Its) (short for "it is")
3. I expect you meant "rotund" and not "orotund", and I expect that's just a typo.
4. should be "understanding what OOPs are", not "is"
5. "the difference between compilation" etc. - the word "in" is superfluous there.
6. "or are going to get there sometime" - again the word "in" is superfluous.
7. "this book will make your Sunday", not "makes". (Out of curiosity though, why Sunday?)

But I must stress this is really nitpicking and generally your writing is very good. The guy who said you know how to turn a phrase was speaking the truth - take it as a compliment!
Reply from Meirav Micklem (Worthing - England)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 6:32 am

Interestingly, another poster on the alt.usage.english Google forums gave me an almost identical list, but you have some additional tips you've pointed out that he didn't. There are a few differences. Are you by any chance Jerry, although I don't really think so. But I must thank you sincerely. You've been extremely helpful in guiding me. Very many thanks, Meriav. I can now see where I might have been off the mark.
Reply from Sathyaish Chakravarthy (New Delhi - India)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 6:46 am

I realize I am turning it into a habit not getting the names right the first time, Meirav. I am sorry for the wrong spelling.
Reply from Sathyaish Chakravarthy (New Delhi - India)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 7:01 am

Most people have fun and games getting my name right, Sathyaish, so don't worry about it. I'm glad to have been of help. And I can assure you I am not and have never been Jerry, though it is my husband's nickname. (But he hasn't discovered the internet yet, so it wasn't him.)

Happy writing!
Reply from Meirav Micklem (Worthing - England)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 7:15 am

Oh! I couldn't have guessed about your gender, with my lack of knowledge on the etymology behind names. What a pleasant surprise indeed, Meirav.
Reply from Sathyaish Chakravarthy (New Delhi - India)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 7:29 am

You would need some knowledge of Hebrew names to be able to guess! I'm an Israeli. My name comes from the Hebrew Bible - Meirav was one of King Saul's daughters.
Reply from Meirav Micklem (Worthing - England)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 7:44 am

Yeah, Meirav, but he doesn't know how "prickly" you are! Has your husband determined this yet? *G*
Reply from Leif Thorvaldson (Eatonville - U.S.A.)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 7:58 am

Sathyaish (smiling to himself)
Reply from Sathyaish Chakravarthy (New Delhi - India)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 8:13 am

Leif, you will have noticed I have lost my prickly surname. *g* (Sathyaish: my surname before I got married was Hebrew for "thistle", hence Leif's joke.)

Anyway, God has been changing me a lot in recent years, so I am less prickly.
Reply from Meirav Micklem (Worthing - England)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 8:27 am

If instead of becoming less prickly, you had recently become a bank robber, would that also be God's doing?

Reply from Erik Kowal ( - England)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

Pin-point errors, please!

Post by Archived Reply » Sat Dec 29, 2001 8:41 am

You can't "become" a bank robber. You're either born a bank robber or you're not. Trust me, I know bank robbers.
Reply from Zachary Walls (Dixon - U.S.A.)
Post actions:
Signature: Reply imported and archived

End of topic.
Post Reply